
Trucking has the lowest AI adoption of any industry. It also has the clearest use case.
94.5% of fleets bill detention. Fewer than half of those invoices get paid. On a 75-truck fleet that gap is roughly $308,000 a year, lost to paperwork.
The JPMorganChase Institute went through de-identified bank transaction data for 4.6 million small businesses and asked which of them had ever actually paid for an AI service. Transportation and warehousing came in at 5.4%, the lowest of any sector measured. Not the lowest among laggards. The lowest, full stop.
The usual explanation is that the work is physical, so the tools do not fit. Run the numbers on your own fleet and you will find the opposite.
Start with the money you already billed and never collected
The American Transportation Research Institute studied driver Detention: the time a truck driver is held at a shipper or receiver beyond the agreed free time, and the fee billed for it. across 2023 data and found two things that sit uncomfortably together.
94.5% of fleets charge detention fees. Fewer than half of those invoices get paid.
Now put your own fleet through it. ATRI puts truckload driver detention at between 117 and 209 hours a year depending on sector; take 173 hours, the truckload figure. A 75-truck fleet running one driver per truck is carrying roughly 12,975 detention hours a year.
The only sourced detention rate card available comes from the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, whose 2023 survey of 253 members puts billed rates at $53 an hour for owner-operators under their own authority, $45 leased-on, $37 for company drivers. Take the middle figure. That is $583,875 of theoretically billable detention on a 75-truck fleet.
Apply ATRI’s own collection reality: 94.5% invoiced, under half paid. Roughly $308,000 a year, billed or billable, that never lands.
Every dollar of that is lost to a clerical failure. An arrival time not captured. A departure not timestamped. An invoice not raised inside the customer’s dispute window. A claim raised without the evidence to survive a phone call. None of it is a driving failure.
Three hundred thousand dollars of work you already did. Establishing whether that is your number, against your own ELD and TMS records, starts at $15,000 and reports in six weeks.
“Time of arrival at either the shipper or consignee starts the clock on detention.”
— Danny Crooks, VP of Corporate Transportation, Averitt Express
The clock is a record. Whoever holds the better record wins the argument.
And the loss you never billed at all
The uncollected invoice is only half of it. ATRI’s 2026 operational cost report puts the direct cost of detention at $5,392 per truck per year, inflation-adjusted to 2025. On 75 trucks, that is $404,400 in fuel, wages, insurance and truck payments burned while parked.
Set that against the same report’s margin table. Truckload carriers ran a 0.4% operating margin in 2025. Flatbed and oversize ran negative. At four tenths of one percent, a carrier would need roughly a hundred million dollars of revenue to earn the operating profit that a 75-truck fleet is currently leaving at loading docks.
That is not a rounding error inside a thin-margin business. In a thin-margin business, that is the business.
“Detention is so common that many industry professionals have accepted it as inevitable without realizing the true extent of its costs.”
— Chad England, CEO, C.R. England
Eight years, one federal recommendation, still no number
Here is how thoroughly unmeasured this is.
In January 2018 the US Department of Transportation’s Inspector General published an audit of driver detention. It found that a fifteen-minute increase in average dwell time raises a carrier’s expected crash rate by 6.2%, and estimated detention was costing truckload drivers between $1.1 billion and $1.3 billion a year in earnings, or $1,281 to $1,534 per driver, on 2013 data.
Its central finding was the absence of data. In the report’s own words: “Accurate industrywide data on driver detention do not currently exist.” The recommendation was to build a plan to collect it.
FMCSA commissioned that study. The information collection was approved in February 2024, the work went to the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, and completion was expected in July 2025.
As of today the study page is still recruiting carriers to take part.
Eight and a half years after the federal government identified the gap, there is still no industry-wide detention number. Meanwhile every carrier reading this already holds the answer in its own ELD: Electronic Logging Device, hardware that automatically records a truck’s engine hours to enforce Hours of Service compliance. and TMS records, timestamped, load by load, going back years. The data problem is not that it does not exist. It is that nobody has turned it into an invoice.
The industry is pointing AI at the part that works
Look at what carriers say they are buying.
Penske Truck Leasing, which sells AI fleet products, commissioned a survey of 255 transportation and logistics executives in April 2025 and found 70% reporting they had adopted AI solutions. Take that as the ceiling. The interesting part is the use cases:
Route optimization. Fleet planning. Predictive maintenance. The truck and the road. Not one of these surveys names documentation, and no driver coaching either — the industry’s own conception of AI in trucking is aimed squarely at the HOS: Hours of Service, the federal rules limiting how long a commercial truck driver may drive and work before a required rest period. and the driving, which is the part that already works.
Seventy percent report adoption. Under six percent have bought anything. That distance is the market, and it is the same shape across every industry that runs the physical world.
The same Penske survey found 84% of transportation executives saying their industry lags behind others on AI. They are right, and they are looking in the wrong direction while being right.
The record is also where the fines live
Detention is the largest documentation cost in a carrier, and it is not the only one.
Federal penalties for HOS recordkeeping violations run to $1,584 for each day the violation continues, up to $15,846. That is a fine for the record, not for the driving. A carrier can run a clean fleet, on time, without an accident, and still be paying four figures a day because a log was wrong.
FMCSA’s own paperwork burden estimate for hours-of-service regulations, published in the Federal Register in September 2025, comes to 53.4 million hours a year across 4.45 million drivers and 813,844 carriers. That covers duty-status entry and supporting-document retention only. It does not count exception review, driver coaching memos, or the argument with a shipper about who was where when.
Nobody has measured those. We looked. Every figure in circulation on safety-manager time comes from a compliance software vendor with no method disclosed.
One more gap worth naming. ATRI’s 2025 survey of over 4,200 industry stakeholders ranks detention as the fifth most important issue for drivers. It does not appear in the carriers’ top ten at all. The people who absorb the cost and the people who could fix it are looking at different problems.
Where the first step goes
If the loss is in the record, then the first thing worth fixing is the drafting and the capture, not the routing.
That has two shapes, and both are measurable in weeks.
Dispatch and safety. First-pass hours-of-service exception summaries drafted from your ELD data, raw inspection reports turned into consistent driver coaching memos, FMCSA regulation questions answered during roadside-incident follow-up. This runs alongside Samsara, Motive or whatever your fleet already reports through. It is one department, measured, from $15,000.
The six weeks, concretely: a week pulling your own detention and HOS exception history and timing what safety currently spends on it, two weeks configuring agents against your live ELD feed and your own past memos, three weeks of the safety desk working real exceptions with it, and a written comparison at the end. Your ELD provider stays where it is.
Freight operations. The heavier version: an embedded pod rebuilds the detention workflow against your real TMS and ELD data, auto-flagging detention events against each customer’s contracted free time and generating a ready-to-send invoice packet with the timestamps already attached. That runs against live data, wired into McLeod, Trimble or whatever runs your loads, with a go or no-go gate before anything scales.
The full picture of what AI-native transportation looks like runs from dispatch to delivery. No carrier should start there. Start where the money is already leaking.
The number to go and find
Everything above is somebody else’s data. Here is yours, and it takes one query against systems you already pay for.
Pull last quarter. How many detention events did your fleet record. How many got invoiced. How many of those invoices got paid.
If the answers are close to ATRI’s, a 75-truck operation is leaving around $308,000 on the table every year, in money it already earned, for want of a timestamp and an invoice raised on time.
That number is already sitting in your TMS. It takes one query, and it is the cheapest diagnostic available in this business.
Get StartedWhy is AI adoption so low in trucking?
Transportation and warehousing came in at 5.4% in the JPMorganChase Institute's April 2026 analysis of 4.6 million small businesses, measured as having ever paid for an AI service, the lowest of any sector. The gap is less about the work being physical and more about where the industry has pointed its attention: every major survey of AI use in trucking names route optimization, fleet planning and predictive maintenance, and none of them names documentation, which is where the measurable losses sit.
How much does driver detention cost a carrier?
ATRI's 2026 operational cost report puts the direct cost at $5,392 per truck per year, inflation-adjusted to 2025 from its 2023 study. On a 75-truck fleet that is roughly $404,400 in fuel, wages, insurance and truck payments incurred while parked. Set against a 2025 truckload operating margin of 0.4%, that loss exceeds the operating profit of a far larger carrier.
How much detention actually gets billed and paid?
ATRI found that 94.5% of fleets charge detention fees, and fewer than half of those invoices are paid. Applying that to 173 detention hours per truckload driver per year at the $45 hourly rate reported by leased-on owner-operators, a 75-truck fleet is looking at roughly $308,000 a year in detention that is billable and never collected.
Is there official data on driver detention?
No. The US DOT Inspector General reported in January 2018 that accurate industry-wide detention data does not exist and recommended building a collection plan. FMCSA's successor study, run by the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, had its information collection approved in February 2024 and was expected to complete in July 2025. It is still recruiting carriers. Individual carriers, however, already hold detention data in their own ELD and TMS records.
Where should a carrier apply AI first?
Dispatch and safety documentation, then the detention-to-invoice workflow. Both are drafting and record-capture problems with dated outputs, which makes a before-and-after measurable in weeks. A bounded first step on one department starts at $15,000 and produces a documented result on your own data inside six weeks, with a real go or no-go decision at the end.
SOURCES (13)
- JPMorganChase Institute, "Small Business in the Age of AI: Understanding the use of AI among small businesses", April 2026
- American Transportation Research Institute, "Costs and Consequences of Truck Driver Detention: A Comprehensive Analysis (Leslie and Murray)", September 2024
- American Transportation Research Institute, "An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking: 2026 Update", 15 July 2026
- Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Foundation, "2023 Detention Time Survey", February 2024
- Transport Topics, "Detention Data Drives Shift From Delay to Decision (Danny Crooks quotation)", 8 June 2026
- American Transportation Research Institute, "Press release (Chad England quotation)", 10 September 2024
- US Department of Transportation, Office of Inspector General, "Estimates Show Commercial Driver Detention Increases Crash Risks and Costs (Report ST2018019)", 31 January 2018
- Virginia Tech Transportation Institute for FMCSA, "Impact of Driver Detention Time on Safety and Operations", approved February 2024
- Penske Truck Leasing, "The Transportation Leaders Survey: A Road to AI Adoption", fielded 16-23 April 2025
- CCJ, "2026 State of Sustainable Fleets", 6 May 2026
- eCFR, "49 CFR Part 386, Appendix B, Penalty Schedule", amended 21 July 2026
- FMCSA, "Agency Information Collection Activities; Hours of Service of Drivers Regulations, Federal Register", 12 September 2025
- American Transportation Research Institute, "Critical Issues in the Trucking Industry, 2025", October 2025



